| 
        
          
            | 98 | THE MOHAMMEDAN CONTROVERSY |  | 
| 
    sincere in his inquiries. As to
    his book, part of which I have read, I think he will find that he is highly
    mistaken." 
     | 
  | 
    "The other day I saw two
    Mohammedans disputing among themselves about the objections contained in the
    Mîzân-ul-Haqq, regarding the miracles of Mohammed. One of them was
    endeavouring to solve the difficulties; but the other was altogether
    dissatisfied with his explanations." 
     | 
  | 
  The same intelligent Hindoo, with another Hindoo coadjutor (both of them, by
  the way, specimens of the good effects that may be produced by the system of
  education pursued in our Government Colleges), has himself entered the lists
  with the Mohammedans. The following account of a controversy held by them with
  the Cazee of Dehli, is extracted from the same report:
     | 
  | 
    
        A Controversy between a Hindoo and the Cazee of Dehli.  This
        is a very interesting argument: it is the one referred to at page 12 of
        last year's report, and was made over to the Committee by the Hindoo,
        who is desirous that it should be printed. It is entirely aggressive on
        the part of the Hindoo, who carries the battle into Mohammedan
        territory; the chief ground occupied, being the insufficiency of the
        evidences or the miracles alleged to have been wrought by Mohammed. The
        argument opens with a short paper by the Hindoo, who states his doubts,
        especially as regards the "splitting of the moon," and asks
        for evidence. The Cazee answers in a paper of considerable length,
        endeavouring to, bolster up the tottering edifice of traditions, and
        explain away the damaging admissions which pervade the Coran. The Hindoo
        rejoins in a long paper, in which he completely demolishes the Cazee's
        argument, proceeds to impugn the morality of the Coran, and closes with
        a decided expression of preference for Christianity and its evidences.
        The Cazee made no reply. | 
  | 
    The Committee are preparing a
    short paper by way of conclusion, and opportunity will be taken to add
    something on the insufficiency of the historical evidence in support of the
    Mohammedan traditions. The Committee trust that this publication will be
    received with acceptance by the Hindoo community, and with interest by all. 
     | 
  | 
  The above work is now in the press: and a most important document was placed
  in the hands of the Committee in time to be added as an appendix. It consists
  of twenty - three questions sent by a Mohammedan of Kerach to his brother
  Moslems, with the view of eliciting any possible proofs of the truth of Islam.
  The paper opens thus: "I was born a Mohammedan, and, at, my
  twenty-fourth year, am still of the
     |