The Murder of Abu `Afak

INTRODUCTION

After Muhammad arrived in Medina in 622 AD, a number of local people began to dislike him. Many of them were Jews, some were Pagan Arabs. One by one, Muhammad's critics were silenced; some became Muslims, some were murdered, others were driven out of Medina. This paper deals with Muhammad's request to have his men murder a Jewish man named Abu Afak. Abu Afak was a 120 year old man. Afak's crime: he urged his fellow Medinans to leave Muhammad.


PRESENTATION OF ISLAMIC SOURCES

NOTE: My comments will be enclosed by [ ] type brackets. Other brackets like ( ) are in the translations.

FROM THE SIRAT RASUL ALLAH (THE LIFE OF THE PROPHET OF GOD), BY IBN ISHAQ (1), page 675:


FROM THE KITAB AL TABAQAT AL KABIR (BOOK OF THE MAJOR CLASSES), Volume 2, BY IBN SA'D, (2), page 31:


FROM A CONTEMPORY MUSLIM SCHOLAR ON ISLAM

FROM ALI DASHTI'S "23 YEARS: A STUDY OF THE PROPHETIC CAREER OF MOHAMMAD", (3) page 100:

And prior to listing all of the assassinations Muhammad had ordered, Ali Dashti writes on page 97:


DISCUSSION

Afak urged the people who lived in Medina to doubt and leave Muhammad. Afak found that Muhammad's sayings were strange and dictatorial. He chided the Arabs that put their faith in Muhammad. Muhammad heard of this and viewed the 120 year old man as a threat to his credibility, not to his life. Nowhere does it say that Afak urged his fellow Arabs to attack or harm Muhammad. Certainly a 120 year old man was not a physical threat to Muhammad or his followers.

What I find interesting is the last statement in Umama b. Muzayriya's verse:

This statement displays that the Muslims knew exactly what they were doing. They knew it was cold-blooded murder that they were doing at Muhammad's request. They wanted to keep it secret, they wanted to hide their evil deeds from the populace at large. That's why Umama said he wouldn't reveal who murdered Afak. The line "Take that Abu Afak in spite of your age!" also indicates a certain bad conscience about this deed even though it is overlayed with triumphalism trying to silencing this inner voice indicating that this was wrong.

Does anyone ever wonder why the news from the Islamic world are as they are? Ammnesty International just reported that over 1500 political prisioners were executed in Iraq last year.

In Algeria the extremist groups are killing by the thousands those who do not support them.

Ayatollah Khomenni. A reformer and reviver of Islam. His fundamentalist Islamic regime had dissident Iranians murdered all over the world.

Can we really accuse them to be unIslamic in their behavior? Are they not following their role model, Muhammad himself in his methodology of killing those who are a threat to your credibility?


QUESTIONS

1)
What does it say about Muhammad that he would have a 120 year old man murdered because he urged his fellow citizens to doubt his message and not to follow him?

2)
Yes, Abu Afak was a threat to Muhammad's credibility. But did he deserve to be murdered, in cold blood, in the night, secretly, while he was sleeping? Was his opinion that much of a threat to Muhammad? Didn't the angels help Muhammad at the Battle of Badr? If so, why was Muhammad afraid of a 120 year old man?

3)
Are these "Islamic" values compatible with our values in America? Should Americans who criticize Muhammad expect to have their freedom of speech threatened, or should they live in fear of being killed for speaking their mind? Remember, Muslims in America have already begun to murder Americans for the sake of their religion, both abroad and in the USA itself.

4)
If Muhammad put this system in place, i.e., the murdering of people who disagree with him, how does it affect Islamic society? How does it relate to what we have seen done in Islamic societies such as Algeria, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, and Sudan?

5)
If Muhammad were alive today, and we knew of the people he had murdered, what would America say? What would you say? Wouldn't we want to see this type of man pay for his crimes, put in jail for life, or even executed?

6)
Don't we have the right to judge Muhammad according to the best moral standards we know of? He claimed to be the last prophet of God. He claimed his system was God's final system for all mankind. So by our standards, don't you think that what Muhammad did was terribly wrong? If our standards are better than his, then how does his self asserted "prophethood" really rate? Why should our standards eclipse those of God's final prophet?

In the end, everyone has to draw his own conclusions. But we should draw conclusions only on the basis of being presented all the information. And then everyone is responsible before God what he does with it. May the Lord help us all.


REFERENCES

(1)
"The Life of Muhammad", a translation of Ibn Ishaq's "Sirat Rasul Allah" (The Life of the Prophet of God) by A. Guillaume. This book is the best biography of Muhammad available. Note that Guillaume added in other references from Tabari, and other early Islamic writings.

(2)
"Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir", (Book of the Major Classes), by Ibn Sa'd. Translated by Moinul Haq, published by the Pakistan Historical Society

(3)
"23 YEARS: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammad", by Ali Dashti. Translated by F.R.C. Bagley.


Muhammad and his enemies
Answering Islam Home Page